So I'm starting a little early this year.
As I mentioned in previous posts, I'm working on a new technique. I want it to look less photographic, more expressionistic. I want size-independent resolution. I want the option of easily reworking the images in color. And I want something that will allow me to use a wider variety of sources with less concern about the initial qualities of the images in question -- I want to be able to blend scans from the newspaper, sketches, and photographs from cameras bad and good seamlessly.
What I'm doing is making composite images in Photoshop, then rendering them as black, white, and .25, .50, and .75 flat gray images on separate layers using a combination of the magic wand selection tool and the pencil tool. Then I bring separate files for each layer into Illustrator, autotrace them, and Bob's your uncle. (First time when that phrase seemed right. Apologies to Bob.)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61c14/61c14b7ace53ac1be9b7faf99b7bc5f800eca84e" alt=""
Here's an early attempt. It's still too photographic and busy.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0d3e/f0d3e40056394bc1fd7676fdedd67955b8c9358d" alt=""
4 comments:
Wish I had something to send your way. Nothing better than girding loins on a Tuesday morning...
Well, if you graph out the arcs it's pretty clear that by the time this next issue gets published, you'll be too good for us.
Actually, I MAY have something for you. Just trying to decide if it's right for you...
Joe, I've been trying to leave a comment on your blog, but my connection's funky for some reason.
Your recent run of stories has been rock-solid. I can hardly wait to see it.
And Boy Named Sue was written by Shel Silverstein. Ever check out any of his music? It's pretty fun.
Post a Comment